Keeping Our Talent At Home

By Natalie Shobana Ambrose
theSun, Malaysia
April 22, 2010

On a visit a few years ago to Australia I met a few Thai students sent by their government to study dentistry. I asked them if they were planning to head back to Thailand after studying and they said yes with such enthusiasm.

Eagerly they wanted to go home and serve. They were connected to their country and they knew their country needed them. There was a sense of pride and patriotism that Thailand was the best because they were born there - and it did make a lot of sense.

They also knew Thailand would take care of them. I couldn’t help but feel a tad bit jealous and envious that they had such conviction and connection.

A few years later, my Malaysian friends who were doing their PhD’s in that same university came home to Malaysia to look for jobs. Qualified, talented and ready to serve in Malaysian universities, they were greeted with great difficulty.

Finally one got a job offer with a salary that wouldn’t even cover her living expenses. Surely her three years of student life learning new skills would mean that she could earn a higher salary, but it didn’t matter. She took the job anyway and starts work in a few weeks hoping for a salary raise.

Many students leave Malaysia each year for an overseas education but not all of them eventually come back. We’re not just loosing talent, we’ve lost talent.

Last year Penang lost a US3 billion deal because there were not enough experienced electric and electronic engineers. Where have they gone? Human capital is the foundation of a country’s success, and a lot of our neighbouring countries have known this for years.

An estimated 350,000 Malaysians work in Singapore last year with 150,000 commuting each day. It is a growing number that is very worrying because we need capable talented and qualified locals who are willing to stay.

Perhaps now is as good a time as ever to start discussing how to reverse this. Malaysia though progressive in many ways, was far ahead of other Asian countries when we achieved independence but today, we’re lagging behind. The most important resource- our human capital is flowing quickly like a punctured rice bag and we’re not acting fast enough to stem the tide.

We should be asking the pertinent questions –

How do we increase our talent pool?

How do we attract talent home?

And how do we keep talent?

Do we need an overhaul of our system?

If we don’t address these issues, we’re just going to dry up the talent pool and then what? We’ll be a country of migrant unskilled workers.

The sad reality is that our push factors outnumber the pull factors when in comes to attracting talent.

Recently Coca-Cola announced that it will invest RM1 billion to set up a bottling plant in Malaysia. I would hope that this multinational company would be able to employ Malaysian skilled workers and specialised locals to contribute to the company’s growth.

I guess like those Thai dentists, we should be able to provide a sense of belonging, opportunity and the appropriate compensation to talent wanting to return home. Perhaps this article won’t just add to the pile of similar issues but that the PhD students have more incentive to stay, serve and continue to live in Malaysia.


Natalie misses her friends who got pulled away.
Comments:
letters@thesundaily.com

Back In The Day

Natalie Shobana Ambrose – (8th April, 2010 – theSun)

“One day the world will be beige” exclaimed my friend. We are heading in that direction I suppose. Though I’m quite sure, when ‘that day’ comes, beige would not be an all-encompassing colour- we’d be debating the exact hue one is. I imagine it making quite entertaining conversation.

She’s more a mocha chocolate. Hmm no, no, perhaps more a milky Milo colour, one might say. What about him, he’s more the colour of condensed milk or a pale durian hue.

I love all those foods so I wouldn’t really take offence if I’m lumped into the same category as my indulgences. But we’re so consumed with skin colour that we would definitely have a colour chart, like the ones they have in the paint shop.

In South African back in the day, one was classified by the comb test. If you couldn’t run the comb through your hair- off you went to the chocolate side of the race list. Yes the race list, all part of the Race Classification Act. There was also the pencil test – if a pencil placed in your hair did not fall out- it didn’t mean you needed to head to the hairdressers for an intense moisturising hair treatment. It meant that your hair was too curly to fit in to the cotton group.

Makes me wonder about those shampoo-conditioner adverts where the model with chopsticks in her hair yanks it away to smooth, shiny, lovely hair that gets the guy’s attention. I bet she’d be shocked knowing that the chopsticks holding her hair in place meant a whole different thing back in the day and got unwanted attention instead.

I’m stressing the phrase “back in the day” because it seems more acceptable that these things happened back in the day and not today. After all, back in the day people were rather clueless. Sure stuff was written on tablets way before Apple came up with its very own version, but those people back in the day were pretty uncouth it seems.

What about interracial marriages? O golly gosh me.
Even America had anti-miscegenation laws up till 1967. Seriously? Yup, they even had a statute entitled “An Act to Preserve Racial Integrity” of 1924. As crazy as it sounds, perhaps we can’t hold them too accountable to such an absurd law anymore since it was back in the day and their President if of mixed parentage.

Shocked? I know I was when I read this. Perhaps you might think it absurd that people would go that far to discriminate and make life so difficult just because a person looked different, even in their own country.

Malaysia decided to build its identity based on race instead of nationalism. So here we are today, constantly debating and fighting for our own race, forming race-based political groups, race-based economic policies and enabling racial discriminatory laws to rule.
We’re doing this, thinking we’re preserving race when all we’re doing is going back to what it was back in the day. Instead of moving forward, we’re really running back to the past.

We’re so divided because our whole identity seems to be founded on where we fit on the colour chart instead of being patriotic. Ironically two weeks ago while overseas, I found myself in a conversation with people from different parts of the world and there I was explaining that I was Malaysian first and only then would I explain my chocolate ancestry. Much to my disappointment that is not how a lot of people feel even in Malaysia.

I must say preservation of race is a really odd term in the vocabulary of a multiracial multicultural country. The ironic thing is I remember a time back in the day, when my Malaysian passport forbade me from going to South African because Malaysia did not approve of their race-relations methods.

Natalie is a fan of the colour beige but not a fan of whitening creams.
Comments: letter@thesundaily.com