Who Ate All The Pie?


By Natalie Shobana Ambrose
theSun, Malaysia
June 17, 2010
It’s  a known fact that Malaysians love to eat. When it comes to food, shoes and malls, we’re spoilt for choice.
I remember from a young age being introduced to the “all you can eat” buffet. Everything looks so good and I must have it all – especially the desserts. So I’d pile on my plate not just with one but a few mini cakes, the little tartlets and kuih-muih – all to be wasted later after a taste test.
That’s when I learnt the idiom “waste not, want not” and realised that my eyes were always much, much bigger than my stomach. My greed overtook my hunger and I ended up wasting so much food.
Of course as a child I was told, think of all the children around the world with no food and I’d always wonder if my half eaten curry puff would survive the travel and if a hungry person would still find it appetising.
As Malaysians we’re quite greedy or perhaps just as human beings, we’ve got the greed gene in us – not just for food.  Bigger, nicer, fancier cars, that designer shoes, or the super expensive watch whose brand name I can’t even pronounce, or the third, fourth and fifth condo, the latest most “canggih” phone.
And let’s face it, besides the greed gene, there’s that show-off gene that goes hand in hand with it.
Keeping up with the Joneses or just our own personal wants and greed can lead to real disaster – oil spill levels of disaster. It’s not that far-fetched to say that personal greed was involved in BP’s oil spill but if we look at the causes behind BP’s oil spill disaster; cutting corners, outsourcing to avoid responsibility, blame shifting, the underlying reason is greed that lined the pockets of the corrupt for generations – in exchange for the livelihoods of the not so wealthy and worse still the environment. 
But we don’t have to go as far as America to find massive amounts of greed. Our logging and construction history and industry, or the sad reality of how foreign workers are exploited for the benefit of their employers’ pockets.
Perhaps we don’t have massive oil spills but we do have massive landslides because of greed which deliberately overlooked safety and we too have companies with enormous losses reported when logically, they should never be in the red and that dark a red.
On one hand in Malaysia we see the über rich enjoying that fancy meal and shopping in the afternoon and on the other hand there are warnings about Malaysia becoming the next Greece, threats of subsidies being cut for basic goods that would help the lower and middle-income groups, while the rich and powerful give speeches about how the average Malaysian has to tighten his or her belt. 
We tend to think that the poor only have themselves to blame or that the not wealthy are lazy, but as the pie gets bigger, you’d think that my slice too would get bigger for all the hard work I put in.
However, my slice gets smaller and I give up more of the comforts I knew and cringe every time I’m at the cashier in the grocery store while chauffeur-driven cars wait outside for the house help to be done with the shopping.
How are people expected to survive when basic items such as diapers, infant formula and even fruits come with high price tags?
Could there be a connection with the wealth of the über rich and the lacking of the poor?
Lets just look at how much money has been siphoned just in the past year from PKFZ to what has been reported in the A-G’s report.
Has that money been recovered?
No, and who has benefited?
Instead, the average Malaysian who feels the 80 sen increase in the price of nasi lemak bought at the market is told to suck it in and live more modestly, while reports of gross corruption surface repeatedly.
So who has all the pie and can I have some too?
Natalie is all for a comfortable lifestyle but not at the expense of another’s. Comments: letters@thesundaily.com

Testing The Human

By Natalie Shobana Ambrose
theSun, Malaysia
June 3, 2010


Interviewer: Why experiment on animals?
Scientist: Well, animals are very much like humans.
Interviewer: So why is it ethically and morally acceptable to experiment on animals but not humans?
Scientist: Animals are not at all like humans.
Interviewer: But you just said ...
Scientist: They cannot reason nor can they talk.
Interviewer: But can they suffer?

How many atrocities have we seen just this last year in our own country towards animals?

Stray dogs shipped off to a remote island to die of starvation, tigers being drugged and abused for so called entertainment, the numerous cases of pangolins smuggled and killed for their alleged medicinal purposes, cock fights for some man’s pleasure, elephants being shot, trapped and killed for being in their forest occupied by man, not to forget the plight of the orang utans or the everyday kera that loses its home to ugly condominiums, and now the proposal to set up a US$140 million (RM464 million) animal testing lab.

Cruel is all that comes to mind.

What is even more appalling is that those in favour of this lab are using the misinterpretation of religion to justify such devilish acts.

I am of the belief that God gave man the responsibility to be compassionate and loving towards animals, and it irks me to think that there are some who misinterpret that to mean an animal’s fate is for it to be tortured for testing. How can we pray to God for mercy when we ourselves show no mercy towards the animals under our care?

Sure a lot of the products we use and even medications have been tested on animals and because it would be too dangerous to test on humans, I would be a hypocrite if I do not acknowledge this fact.

However, my contention is with the fact that the company wanting to build this laboratory would probably not get a permit to do so in its own country. Yet we are so quick to defend its proposal.

Yes, foreign investment is needed for a growing economy like ours, but can it not be at the expense of animals and can it be ethical investments?

Perhaps if animals could vote, then those in favour would be of a different opinion.

I remember having to dissect some animals for biology lab classes and what I remember is not the scientific lesson but how disgusted I felt and how I ended up not doing those experiments. I also remember how for a cognitive psychology class, we watched videos of lab rats with various parts of their brain altered, once again, I remember little of the lesson but more about the rats.

Vivisection is cruel, because we trick ourselves to think we are advancing somehow, when in fact, what we lose is human character. Doesn’t an animal with a central nervous system like cats or rats feel similar hunger pangs and pain when hurt like we do?

The mere fact that these animals cannot oppose such pain inflicted on them, causes my enmity towards vivisection. Do animals really deserve to be treated in such a manner? I do not believe any religion would agree.

In the name of science and religion, some think that we are entitled to do this but surely science in such an advanced state can find alternatives to testing on animals – by alternatives I do not mean testing on humans as suggested by advocates of this lab.

I think what is most disheartening is the mentality that humans have the right to abuse nature for our own gains, yet we forget the lesson that the more we exploit nature the more vengeful its reaction.

The fact that Malaysia does not have sufficient animal protection laws means that there will not be adequate regulations to govern what will place in this lab.

This itself should be cause for concern to those with the decision making power – if those who should care were bothered enough to care.

Natalie quotes “4 legs good, 2 legs bad” – Animal Farm.
Comments: letters@thesundaily.com