Being The Headlights Of Civilisation


By: Natalie Shobana Ambrose
theSun, Malaysia (pg 12)
May 31st, 2012

“Nothing but the truth” was the Indonesian government’s tag line of the day when commenting on the country’s periodical human rights report being presented at the United Nations Human Rights Council last week. Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa told the press: “We will present things as they are. No more, no less.”
I was impressed by the desire and spoken determination of an Asean government to want to address the shortcomings of its country given that many Asean countries recoil when it comes to upholding human rights.
Admittedly there were many more scathing reports later about Indonesia’s weakness in championing the freedom of religion, yet there was an acknowledgement by the government for its need to do more, a verbal commitment to follow through and the maturity to heed criticism – which showed that Indonesia even with chinks in its armour was spearheading the human rights agenda within Asean and even has a Ministry of Justice and Human Rights.
Sadly, this highlight came at a time in our country where a human rights defender had been questioned for statements in an interview. The statements were Irene Fernandez’s comment about Malaysia not being safe for Indonesian workers because it did not have a legal framework or specific laws to protect migrant workers.
It continued that she had claimed Bangladeshis in Malaysia were often harassed by the country’s authority. She was accused of tarnishing the image of the country, being unpatriotic and causing a two-left feet slip-up in Malaysia’s diplomatic dance with Indonesia.
Yet a few days later after the kooky kerfuffle about her “wrongdoings”, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz admitted that the management of foreign workers affairs could no longer be carried out on an ad hoc basis and will look into having a Foreign Workers Act. A similar call for more protection mechanisms said only by different mouthpieces and one now faces possible criminal charges.
The abuses that foreign workers in Malaysia have endured is well documented, to the point two other Asean countries have imposed a moratorium on Malaysia bringing in foreign workers. Are not those who abuse foreign workers under their care the ones that have embarrassed and tarnished the name of the nation? The humiliating question then of how many other Asean countries have had lifted moratoriums reinstated needs to play as a bitter reminder of the country’s neglect.
So instead of being the headlights of civilised Asean countries, we are now determined to even give up the position of taillights for mud flaps, intimidating and harassing not the abusers but those speaking up for basic protection mechanisms for foreign workers.
Malaysia’s foreign policy is stained not by human rights defenders stating the obvious. Our foreign policy is stained by those who restrict and inflict fear in people brave enough to stand up for the rights of other human beings.
So many of us practise tacit consent, when we should instead be using our freedom to speak up for those who can’t and standing up for what is right. Maybe if we all did, we would raise the bar of conversation in the public sphere – which now seems to be curtailed with the curbing of our freedom to be a thinking, active and informed society.
Malaysia attempted to be the headlights of civilisation a while ago by calling for a Global Movement of Moderates yet the level of buffoonery taking place daily has made it hard to be even a tad bit impressed with this so called moderates movement.
Making lofty promises overseas and talking about ideals and wants with regards to human rights is not measured by the applause for a speech but measured by how those affected are treated.
This is where our country suffers a great disconnect. Where policies and promises seem to be traced in air and built on water when it comes to implementation because there are two different rules depending on which political side one is perceived to support – hazing the real issues and taking away the urgency of putting things right.
In a mature democracy there is communication and dialogue, temperance and mutual respect – the use of force is not an option – all words of a speech describing the moderate movement Malaysia convinced the rest of the world to follow.
Yet when juxtaposed against the backdrop of what is happening to human rights defenders in our country – these ideal attributes are missing on our Malaysian soil. How then are we to be the headlights of civilisation?
Natalie believes in the Amnesty saying that
“the only thing necessary for the persistence of evil 
is for enough good people to do nothing”. 

Comments: letters@thesundaily.com

The Devil Is In The Detail


By: Natalie Shobana Ambrose
theSun, Malaysia (pg 12)
May 3rd, 2012

Aung San Su Kyi has a problem with an oath of office with regard to the constitution and on principle managed to pre-empt a historical moment. Her beef was with the words “safeguard the constitution” – refusing to protect the junta written constitution, she requested that safeguard be substituted with “respect” instead. She stood her ground for two weeks (child’s play compared house arrest for 15 years), but has finally agreed to take the oath even without the word being changed – because she knows, the only way change will happen is if she were in Parliament.
As an outsider to Myanmar politics, I can’t help but feel a certain sense of comfort knowing that because Su Kyi is a stickler for detail and has a stubborn streak, laws, by-laws, legislative amendments and all that politicians do in parliament will be met with her tenacious spirit to hold them accountable to detail. I’m quite sure that with Su Kyi in parliament, no legislative bill will ever be passed in one night of a parliamentary sitting – just because it was on the agenda, as was done in Malaysia on April 19.
What was the rush to pass eight extremely contentious bills in one sitting which ended in the wee hours of the morning, after a previous late-night session? One has to question the sincerity and logic of those setting the agenda when things like this go unchecked.
As students of negotiation and mediation practices, we learnt the importance of wearing down opponents not by aggressive means but by subtle delays and background checks masqueraded as harmless corridor chats about family and life during tea breaks. When one is pressing for a decision to be made, alarm bells must go off, and the easiest time of the day to get away with people overlooking detail is the wee hours of the morning when they are worn out. So, how much quality debate went on the night the eight bills were passed?
One has to also wonder if this is in line with the prime minister’s recent declaration to make Malaysia “the world’s best democracy”.
Decision makers have the power to decide who to protect and what to secure. Unfortunately, ours have not made very good decisions and chosen to protect their own interest instead of that of the people.
For these reasons, so many people felt deeply enough to make the journey to the heart of Kuala Lumpur on Saturday April 28th, 2012. We feel there is no room left for symbolic grand gestures and tacit consent in our country’s politics. It’s time the pharisaic window-dressing of transformation ended and real change happened. Saturday was not about overthrowing a government or occupying anything. No true Malaysian wishes for chaos on this land – we love it too much. And that is why a sea of people turned up in support for clean and fair elections.
The manner in which the authorities and the government handled the sit-in showed a complete disconnect with wanting to build the world’s best democracy – it seemed quite the opposite, instead adding bricks to fortify authoritarian rule.
From where I was standing as we headed back to the train station, the attacks with tear gas and coffee-coloured chemically laced water was premeditated. It went of like clock-work and suddenly I found myself gasping for air when two tear gas canisters detonated within 5m of each other on the flowerbed of the pedestrian bridge next to the Central Market Annex – how far was that from Dataran Merdeka? Caught between them, I fell to my knees. I remember telling God, “I cannot die this way”, picking myself up and stumbling through the chemical cloud.
My experience is one of thousands and mild compared to what so many others experienced that day in a country building the “best democracy in the world”. The days that followed only showed the insincerity of the new laws passed that April night – when the mainstream media opted for a skewed bias in reporting. All this however cannot take away from the fact that a myriad of people from every social fabric who on a daily basis are separated by race, religion and social status, came together in the thousands, filling the streets of KL for fundamental change in the hope of building a better democracy.
Natalie hopes there will be no more shotgun lawmaking, and that not only will our politicians protect and respect the constitution, but also the people, even when they wear yellow. Comments: letters@thesundaily.com