Malaysia At The Crossroads (Aljazeera 101 East)

Aljazeera's 101 East will be airing the half-hour Malaysia Election show ‘MALAYSIA AT THE CROSSROADS’ on Astro Channel 513 at these times (Malaysian Time):

Friday, 19th April at 6.30am
Friday, 19th April at 5.30pm
Saturday, 20th April at 11.30am
Monday, 22nd April at 1230am.

For those abroad, the first broadcast will be at 2230hrs GMT on Thursday, April 18.

As expected, it will be a fair and objective reflection of the Malaysian political landscape discussing the issues that will have a bearing on how Malaysians may vote.

Included is a 20-minute panel discussion with a 3-man panel and a selected audience of 57 Malaysians from all walks of life. The panellists are Tony Pua (DAP -PR), Datuk Nur Jazlan Mohamad(Umno-BN) and Ibrahim Suffian (Neutral - Merdeka Centre).

It will be uploaded on to Aljazeera's website after its final broadcast on Monday, April 22.

 

Ruined By Praise

By: Natalie Shobana Ambrose
theSun, Malaysia (pg 11 ) April 4th, 2013
Of late, quite a few people have been arrested or warned for being critical of authority. Egypt recently issued an arrest warrant and questioned funny man Bassem Youssef for material on his show that was deemed insulting. He joined a list of lawyers, politicians and activists who have also recently been arrested on similar charges – dissent.
This form of democracy in recent times has become more rampant on our shores too not just with opposition politicians being hauled up to court on charges amounting to a difference in opinion but also with retired generals being threatened for being critical over the country's defence strategy in Lahad Datu. We even took it further by referring our national football coach to the disciplinary board for commenting on the quality of players and analysing why the national team did so poorly in the M-League .
It's very confusing because logically this is their job. They are called the opposition because they have opposing views, the wealth of wisdom former generals possess does not retire just because they have, and the role of a coach is to critically analyse his team's performance and continuously modify it for optimum results. Instead, we are reprimanding these brave voices for being vocal and doing their job. If we truly want to improve, we would try and see the sense in what is being said.
Such criticism coming from experienced people might actually be helpful and if it is not, it provides an opportunity to prove them wrong and a gateway to better explain one's position. Instead we do a disservice to the people by sending these so-called troublemakers to the various disciplinary boards and subpoena them to court in the hope of silencing opposing views. Are these signs of equal justice and a progressive democracy?
It feels like those in authority share the same complex like the emperor in the fairy tale, who preferred to be ruined by praises when showing off his invisible new clothes. This is even more glaring as we are teased about the general election date. Political parties have issued themselves glowing report cards cheapening the term good governance while the people mutter under their breath "self-praise is no praise".
Our media is filled with illustrious reports of how successful these political parties have been but if one is to query the statistics and figures of improvement spewed out, it is considered dissent – when what it really means is that you have a thinking electoral role who is engaging with the data. Unfortunately, there isn't an equally weighted platform for both sides to present their mandates, fund their campaigns and space for their flags, banners and makeshift "bilik gerakan" to be placed.
Looking at the labyrinth of hurdles placed in getting equal and fair access to media, we could learn from Myanmar's reform efforts. After 50 years of censorship under military rule, private daily papers are back on newsstands in the junta-led Myanmar. Their "paper-revolution" has meant loosening restrictions on the media and journalists but also dissolving their press censorship board, better known as the Press Scrutiny and Registration Division. While we offer a mere 10-minute slot to the Opposition with the clause to edit, Myanmar television even unprecedentedly broadcasted opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi's speech early last year.
This is not to say there is total freedom, there are still legal clauses that curtail press freedom but Myanmar is seen to be slowly removing the blinding scales and making positive changes.
In the 2013 Press Freedom Index by Reporters Without Borders, Malaysia ranked 145th out of 179, dropping 23 places. Myanmar may have ranked lower than us at 151, but they moved up 18 places higher than last year. One can only wonder by how much they will overtake us this year, especially if what our politicians only want to hear is self-praise.
It's definitely harder to swallow the bitter pill of criticism but in the long run the consequences of only surrounding ourselves with praise will be far worse.
Natalie couldn't agree more with Norman Vincent Peale's words "The trouble with most of us is that we would rather be ruined by praise than saved by criticism."
Comments: letters@ thesundaily.com




How To Win An Election

By: Natalie Shobana Ambrose
theSun, Malaysia (pg 12 )
March 22, 2013
http://www.thesundaily.my/news/columns/onpointe

If you didn't know the elections are near, you might want to move out from under that coconut shell. The streets are lined with flags and makeshift mini political party offices, even though Parliament has not been dissolved. Ang pow packets, free food, monetary gifts and the likes are being handed out almost daily.
If you own a cell phone, you most probably received a few text messages asking who your vote will go to, or which party will win. Not only did a local politician (whom I'm not acquainted with) send me a generic birthday greeting, I even received one for Mother's Day, though I don't qualify.
Short from feeling irked by my privacy being violated, maybe this is how our politicians think they can win an election.
Certainly these tactics bear resemblances to advice given in the ancient Roman letter "How to win an election" that Quintus Tullius Cicero wrote to his brother Marcus in 64BC who ran (and won) for the highest office in the Republic.
Quoting from the book jacket, Quintus's political wisdom included the importance of promising everything to everyone and reminding voters about the sexual scandals of opponents to being a chameleon, putting on a good show for the masses and flattering them shamelessly to manipulate your way into office.
All this sounds too close to home, making me feel very stage-managed in the lead-up to our elections. Of the 10 take-aways from the book, three stood out as lacking on our political platform, the first 1) Communication skills are key, the second 2) Surround yourself with the right people and the third 3) Give people hope.
Perhaps my take on these are not as sarcastic and raw as Quintus advice but I do agree with him that a poor communicator is still unlikely to win an election despite the new and varied forms of media available today.
Our politicians are not great orators. The lack of debates or the aftermath of a debate (when it does happen), always is cringe-worthy. When asked questions, our politicians go off tangent, don't answer the question and let their emotions get the better of them.
Their answers are reactionary to opposing views instead of visionary. Perhaps this worked before, but today, for me at least, I want answers that are tangible not just talk and pomp about draft proposals that don't see the light of day but real substantial methods how their policies and coming to power will actually benefit me, the individual and the country.
The second point reminds me of the marines' tag-line, "We are looking for a few good men". Quintus advice was to build a trustworthy talented staff saying "you can't be everywhere at once, so find those who will represent you as if they were trying to be elected themselves."
My personal thought is that this includes those in component parties and affiliations. Having politicians who go rogue inciting racism and religious intolerance does not help. You are only as good as the company you keep and pruning away such characters is necessary.
So when issues such as the Global Witness video proving deeply-rooted corruption practices in Sarawak surface, the people watch closely as to how fast the leaders condemn such practices and what the outcome will be. Keeping mum and selective justice do not sit well with voters even if they are not voting in Sarawak.
Giving hope is the third point that we could do with. Of course in this letter Quintus is very rough saying in making the most cynical voters his most devoted followers his brother needs to give them a sense that he can make their world better.
Admitting that Marcus will let them down after the elections and it won't matter because he would already have won. I would however like to see real hope with less disappointment, but for now, both sides have their weaknesses. At the end of the day, voters want improvement in their own lives first and we want someone we can put our hope in to make life better.
Someone who speaks the language of the people and not politicians who carelessly say RM40 is enough for a month's groceries while they dine in the finest restaurants, or those who tell Malaysians to save while they themselves sport the latest watch costing a year's wage for the middle class worker or even the politician that speaks about work-life balance when people struggle to make ends-meet, spending hours stuck in traffic while the politician whizzes past with a police escort.
Leaders need to realise that the best perception management strategy is to attack and resolve the issue.
The Roman Republic may have disappeared thousands of years ago, but Quintus's advice provides insight that can be of use not just to our politicians but also to you, the discerning voter.
Natalie would like to see the right candidates stand, and the most deserving win but more so the people have to come out the winners in the general election.