Deliberative Democracy V Hazy Public Engagement

By: Natalie Shobana Ambrose
theSun, Malaysia (pg 20) June 28, 2013
http://www.thesundaily.my/news/columns/onpointe

No one would have thought a nine cent increase in bus fare would have triggered such mass protests in Brazil. President Dilma Rousseff's speech, which was meant to quell protesters, was criticised for being out of touch.
Perhaps if deliberative democracy efforts such as town hall meetings were called earlier to feel the pulse of such an increase in bus fare, the leaders would have realised that the statistic that Brazilians spend nearly 26% of their income on bus fare would be the straw that broke the camel's back.
This seems to be the global trend and reason for protest – a government that is out of touch. On our shores, how governments of the three haze-affected countries responded is telling. As much as ministers securing meetings across borders to discuss the haze is important, I wonder how effective or powerful a signature on a piece of paper is in stopping the problem.
Personally, I don't think we need to find a solution – the burning just needs to stop. Our lungs will attest that this is not a new phenomenon. It's been going on for years – even Asean has its own Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution that is over a decade old. Yet you and I are breathing in soot as you read this.
We all know the facts but what is glaring though is our lack of management of the issue. What does that air pollutant index (API) mean, how accurate is it and what are the effects of this haze? Our websites pale in comparison to that of the Singapore government.
Statements made by our leaders about the haze show a great disconnect and distance between the leadership and the public. There is more information and engagement seen in Singapore with their minister of foreign affairs making stern statements that Singapore will not be empathetic towards companies found responsible for causing the haze. There is also a Singapore government website providing detailed user-friendly information on the haze and measures to take.
This even includes details of where to buy the N95 masks and how to use it. Add to that more tangible government initiatives where the Ministry of Health stated that their government will subsidise medical treatment for those who suffer from respiratory problems and conjunctivitis due to the haze.
On our end however, what we are told is to stay indoors. That's it? Surely we can do better for our people.
This is just another example of missed opportunities to show leadership and build public trust. It translates into how well the public is engaged in government initiatives and this is why structures such as town hall meetings are so beneficial. It breaks barriers and forces engagement, and this is what will better the nation – where our laws and government stance reflect the tenets of what we believe in.
As uncomfortable, sensitive and complex as the issues are, pretending they don't exist only highlights our incompetency and portrays us as an ostrich with its head in the sand.
We've come to a point of our development where dictating is no longer a workable option, discussions need to be had and the different voices heard. More space needs to be created for deliberative democracy where the government engages with the various layers of society.
Though it is not an excuse, sometimes town halls turn into a verbal bashing session and it is then understandable to see why so few are held. There needs to be a good balance between advocacy, opposition view and genuine dialogue. Creating a gridlock serves no purpose and walkouts defeat the intention for finding equilibrium. How then can we move forward and find solutions for other issues?
There is a void layer of genuine public engagement in Malaysia. If town hall meetings are not on the cards for now, perhaps creating space in the media for engaging dialogues might be a better option. There are enough talk shows couched around propaganda and political party stand but what is missing is intelligent discussions about critical issues. It's telling when even news coverage of our election results was better covered by a Singapore news channel. Sigh.
Such deliberative democracy is the way forward. It may not be perfect, but it would definitely be better than what we have now.
Natalie hopes that the new parliamentary mix allows for deliberative democracy to thrive and dear MPs please no walkouts or gridlocks.
Comment: letters@thesundaily.com